One Language for RiskCompanion site · catalog 1.0
Layer L4

Respond

What is decided, by whom, and how robust the control is. 7 components, chapter 17 of the book.

C4.1

Seven responses, named decider

Every risk carries exactly one response from accept, avoid, mitigate, share, transfer, realize, share, enhance; a row with no response is invalid. Alternatives are compared on cost, effectiveness and feasibility, and the register records the named person who decided and the date.

Source: NIST IR 8286 [9]; NIST SP 800-39 [20]; COSO [2]

C4.2

Hierarchy of controls

Every control carries its level (elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, personal protection), a human-dependence flag and an expected decay profile; controls at the two lower levels are re-tested more often and their ratings age; aggregation weights by level, so a policy and an automated block never count the same.

Source: NIOSH / CDC [10]

C4.3

Prevention and detection

Every control is tagged prevention (acts on the cause) or detection (acts on the mode); occurrence and detection ratings are revisited after any action with the previous values kept, so the register shows whether the action worked.

Source: ASQ FMEA [8]

C4.4

Design gate

No new product, process, system or material change goes live before a review asks whether its hazards can be eliminated or substituted rather than administered; the answer, the level chosen and the signatory are recorded on the control.

Source: NIOSH PtD [10]; BCBS PSMOR principle 7 [17]

C4.5

Decision record

Responses above a stated materiality are recorded in a selection report: alternatives, tolerance per objective, risk of each alternative, rationale, expected exposure, decider, date. Acceptance of a risk above the appetite position is communicated to the governing body.

Source: NASA RIDM [11]; IIA standard 11.5 [18]

C4.6

Proportionality

In the tolerable region, treatment continues until the next step is grossly disproportionate to its benefit; the disproportion is argued in writing with the cost and benefit of the next step, never assumed.

Source: risk-engineering.org [26]

C4.7

AI controls

Every AI system is mapped, measured and managed against the seven trustworthiness characteristics with a current and a target profile; each carries decision rights set by appetite: act reversibly under monitoring, prepare for human approval, or inform only. Tested at model, adversarial and field level.

Source: NIST AI RMF and profiles [21]; PMI AI branch [3]