One Language for RiskCompanion site · catalog 1.0
Appendices A and E

Glossary

One term per idea. The first table is the resolved vocabulary of risk: the term the framework keeps, its definition, and the retired terms kept as aliases with the source that used them. The second explains the technical terms and acronyms the book uses from data, software and the sources themselves.

The resolved vocabulary

Kept termDefinitionAliases (with source)
appetite
Acceptable amount
The amount and kind of risk the governing body wants in pursuit of objectives, stated per category on a scale.risk appetite (COSO, Orange Book, IRM, NIST, IIA)
tolerance
Acceptable amount
The measurable variation around a performance objective that the organization will accept.tolerance as variation (COSO); tolerance, measurable (NIST); tolerable position (Orange Book, renamed accepted position); tolerance boundary (IRM, renamed risk universe boundary)
limit
Acceptable amount
A hard boundary on an exposure, enforced by a system; its breach is an event.limit (Basel, trading); hard limit, cap
threshold
Acceptable amount
The value of an indicator at which escalation is owed.KRI threshold (Basel PSMOR, NIST); trigger (PMI, EBA management actions)
inherent exposure
Before and after controls
Exposure before any control.inherent (COSO, Orange Book, NIST); gross (IRM, UK practice)
expected exposure
Before and after controls
Exposure the controls in place should achieve; a forecast.residual (COSO, Orange Book, ISO); net (IRM); current (NIST)
measured exposure
Before and after controls
Exposure actually observed after the fact.residual, in registers that measure (NIST detail record: measured)
target exposure
Before and after controls
The exposure the organization intends to reach.target risk (COSO)
event
What happened
An occurrence that departs from the expected and may or may not cause harm.event (ISO Guide 73, COSO, IRM); failure, nonconformity (ASQ)
loss event
What happened
An event with a measurable consequence; enters the loss base.loss event (Basel PSMOR); loss (FSB)
near miss
What happened
An event with no consequence this time; enters the loss base with a flag.near miss (Basel PSMOR, ISO Guide 73)
incident
What happened
An event that has been detected, classified and is under response.incident (FSB FIRE, NIST, Orange Book)
response
What is done about it
The decision about a risk: accept, avoid, mitigate, share, transfer, realize, enhance; decided by a named owner.risk response (COSO, NIST); treatment (ISO); mitigation (one option)
control
What is done about it
A measure in place that maintains or modifies risk; carries level, mode and originating response.control (ISO, COSO, Orange Book); safeguard, countermeasure (NIST SP 800); barrier (ASQ, after an event); control activity (COSO)
consequence
How bad
What follows from a scenario, stated against an objective; where several objectives are affected the highest governs.impact (COSO, PMI, NIST, Orange Book); effect (ASQ); adverse effect (NIST)
severity
How bad
The scored magnitude of a consequence on a defined scale.severity (ASQ FMEA, Basel, INFORM Severity)
likelihood
How often
The chance of a scenario, expressed in calibrated words or numbers.likelihood (ISO, NIST); occurrence (ASQ FMEA)
probability
How often
A likelihood expressed as a number between zero and one.probability (PMI, NASA, risk-engineering.org)
frequency
How often
A likelihood expressed as a count per period.frequency (Basel operational risk)
risk
The thing itself
The effect of uncertainty on objectives, recorded as a scenario: condition, departure, asset, consequence.risk (ISO); risk scenario (NASA, NIST 8286A)
hazard
The thing itself
A source of potential harm; coded where a dictionary exists.hazard (UNDRR HIPs, INFORM, NIOSH); source of risk (ISO)
threat
The thing itself
A hazard with intent behind it.threat (NIST, CISA, FSB)
exposure
The thing itself
The value, people or operations in the way of a hazard.exposure (UNDRR, INFORM, Basel)
vulnerability
The thing itself
The susceptibility of what is exposed.vulnerability (UNDRR, INFORM, NIST, FSB)
taxonomy
The structure
The whole hierarchy of categories, organized by source at the first level.risk breakdown structure (PMI); categories (Orange Book); core (NIST CSF)
category
The structure
One node of the taxonomy at any level.category, subcategory (NIST CSF); class, type (UNDRR); domain
owner
The person
The single named person accountable for a risk, control or objective.risk owner (ISO, COSO, NIST); accountable (IIA); sponsor, champion (PMI)
responsible
The person
Whoever performs the work; may be several people.responsible (RACI usage)
assurance
The proof
An opinion given by a party independent of the thing opined on.assurance (IIA, Orange Book); independent assurance
assessment
The proof
An evaluation that may be done by the owner.risk assessment (ISO, NIST SP 800-30); self-assessment (Basel PSMOR)
testing
The proof
Exercise of a control or model against known cases.control testing (IIA); backtesting (Basel); exercise (Ready.gov)
validation
The proof
Confirmation that a model or method is fit for purpose.model validation (Basel); validation against closed form (risk-engineering.org)
verification
The proof
Confirmation that something was done as specified.verification (ASQ); confirmation of action plans (IIA 15.2)
register
The record
The governed list of risks with their fields, in the open schema.risk register (NIST IR 8286, ISO, PMI); risk log (PMI, older usage)
detail record
The record
The full record behind a register row.Risk Detail Record (NIST IR 8286)
profile
The record
A summary of a register against outcomes or tiers; current and target.profile (NIST CSF 2.0, AI RMF); enterprise risk profile (NIST 8286C)
log
The record
A time-ordered record of events or actions.incident log, decision log, loss database (Basel)
scenario
The plan
A described future state with its drivers.scenario (NGFS, EBA, NASA, NIST 8286A, WEF)
stress test
The plan
The projection of the organization's position under an adverse scenario.stress test (EBA, Basel)
reverse stress test
The plan
The search for the scenario that breaks a stated objective.reverse stress test (EBA)
simulation
The plan
The method by which a distribution of outcomes is produced.Monte Carlo (risk-engineering.org, PMI, NASA)
governing body
Governance
The board or equivalent to which management is accountable.board (COSO, Orange Book); governing body (IIA); accountable executive
three lines
Governance
Management, oversight functions, internal audit, each with defined roles.three lines (IIA); first, second, third line
culture
Governance
The shared attitudes and behaviors toward risk, measured in aspects.risk culture (IRM, COSO, Orange Book)
objective
Objectives
A stated aim against which risk and consequence are measured, with a tolerance.objective (COSO, ISO, NASA); performance measure (NASA RIDM); outcome (NIST CSF)
tier
Objectives
The level of the organization a risk is recorded at: enterprise, organization or process, system.tier (NIST SP 800-39, IR 8286); level (IRM: strategic, tactical, operational)
indicator
Indicators
A measured quantity with a threshold; leading if it anticipates, lagging if it records.key risk indicator (Basel PSMOR, NIST); early-warning indicator (Basel liquidity); metric
trend
Indicators
The direction of an indicator or score over time.trend (Orange Book, INFORM, WEF)
business impact analysis
Continuity
The assessment of impact over time per process, giving tolerable outage and recovery targets.BIA (Ready.gov, NIST 8286D, ISO 22301)
recovery time objective
Continuity
How quickly a function or resource must be restored.RTO (Ready.gov, ISO 22301)
recovery point objective
Continuity
How much data loss is tolerable, which dictates backup frequency.RPO (Ready.gov)
maturity
Maturity
The degree to which practices are defined, repeated and improved, expressed as a tier or profile.tiers (NIST CSF, as the framework itself cautions); maturity model (COSO 2026, IIA)
third party
Third parties
An external provider of a service, product or component.vendor, supplier (CISA); service provider (FSB); third party (IIA)
nth party
Third parties
A provider to a provider; visible through bills of materials.nth party (FSB, CISA)
component
Third parties
A unit of software or hardware within a product, identified in a bill of materials.component (CISA SBOM, HBOM)
opportunity
Opportunity
A risk with a favorable consequence; a first-class register entry with the responses realize, share, enhance.opportunity (ISO, COSO, IRM, NIST IR 8286, NASA, NIST CSF GV.RM-07)
decision record
Decision
The documented choice among alternatives with rationale, owner and date.selection report (NASA RIDM); plan of action and milestones (NIST); minute
acceptance above appetite
Decision
A decision to run a risk whose measured exposure exceeds the appetite position; communicated to the governing body.acceptance above appetite (IIA 11.5)
composite index
Aggregation
A score built from indicators by normalization and aggregation, published with its reliability.index (INFORM); score; rating
portfolio view
Aggregation
Risk looked at across objectives or entities rather than one risk at a time.portfolio view (COSO); aggregated risk (NASA); enterprise aggregation (NIST 8286C)
technique
Method
A declared method for identification or analysis, from a recognized catalog.technique (IEC 31010); tool (ASQ); method
criteria
Method
The written rules, set before assessment, for judging likelihood, consequence and acceptability.risk criteria (ISO 31000); scales (PMI); risk model (NIST SP 800-30)
calibration
Method
The confrontation of estimates with outcomes and the adjustment that follows.calibration (PMI library); backtesting (Basel)
precision
Method
How sure an estimate is, recorded with it.precision (PMI); confidence; uncertainty (NASA)
version
Currency
The identified edition of a source, scenario or input, with its retraction status.version, vintage (NGFS); revision (NIST); edition (ISO, COSO)

Technical terms and acronyms

TermMeaning, and where it matters in the book
Action Priority (AP)The AIAG-VDA replacement for the risk priority number in FMEA: a table that reads severity, occurrence and detection together and returns high, medium or low, with the rule that a high severity cannot be diluted by a low occurrence. Component C3.3 [8].
Agent (software agent)A program, usually built on a language model, that reads documents and data, draws conclusions and takes actions with limited supervision: drafting a self-assessment from logs, reconciling a register with an appetite statement, answering a questionnaire. Chapters 2, 3 and 23 argue that agents expose the cost of the dialects because they read only the text.
AIAG-VDAThe joint FMEA handbook of the Automotive Industry Action Group and the German automotive association (Verband der Automobilindustrie), source of the Action Priority. Section 6.1 [8].
ARIAAssessing Risks and Impacts of AI, the NIST program that evaluates AI systems in realistic use rather than on benchmarks alone. Section 7.3 [21].
BacktestingComparing a model's forecasts with what actually happened over a fixed window: Basel counts the days in the last 250 on which the loss exceeded the model's estimate and raises the capital multiplier as the exceptions accumulate. Component C3.6 [5].
BCBSThe Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the committee of central banks and supervisors that writes the Basel Framework. Chapter 5 [5] [17] [19].
BIA (business impact analysis)The continuity exercise that establishes, for each function, how long it can be interrupted and what the interruption costs over time. Section 8.1 and component C5.6 [16].
CalibrationChecking that the scores or probabilities an organization assigns agree with what later happens: a likelihood band that says once in one to three years should, over enough risks and enough years, be right about that often. Component C5.5.
Composite indexA single score built from many indicators brought to a common scale and weighted, such as INFORM Risk; the book requires that the weights, the scale transformations and the reliability of the underlying data be published with the score. Component C3.5 [7].
Controlled vocabularyA fixed, published list of allowed values for a field, each with a definition and usually a code, so that two records using the same value mean the same thing. The hazard dictionary and the global risks list are controlled vocabularies. Component C2.5 [24] [22].
ConvergenceIn a simulation, the point at which running more trials no longer changes the result materially; a simulation that reports its result without showing that it converged has not proved itself. Component C3.4 [26].
CRE, MAR, SRPThe chapter codes of the consolidated Basel Framework: CRE for credit risk, MAR for market risk, SRP for the supervisory review process (SRP31 covers interest rate risk in the banking book). A number after the code is the chapter, as in MAR12. Chapter 5 [5] [19].
CSF 2.0The NIST Cybersecurity Framework, version 2.0, whose six functions, Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover, put governance first. Section 7.4 and component C0.4 [23].
Data lineageThe recorded path of a number from the system where it originated, through every transformation, to the report in which it appears, so that the number can be traced and reproduced. Component C5.1 [17].
DioptraA NIST test platform for measuring how AI models behave under attack and under changes in their inputs. Section 7.3 [21].
Early Warnings for AllThe United Nations initiative to give every person on earth coverage by a multi-hazard early-warning system; the book takes from it the four elements of a warning chain. Section 8.2 [24].
FIREFormat for Incident Reporting Exchange, the Financial Stability Board's common format for reporting operational incidents, with eighty-seven information items in four sections and a published taxonomy. Component C5.4 [27].
FMEAFailure mode and effects analysis: for each function of a product or process, the ways it can fail, the effect of each failure, its cause, the controls that prevent or detect it, and a priority. Section 6.1 and component C2.3 [8].
GARThe Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, published by UNDRR. Section 8.2 [24].
HashA short fixed-length fingerprint computed from a file, such that any change to the file changes the fingerprint; a software bill of materials records a hash for each component so that the component can be identified exactly. Component C2.7 [15].
HBOM, SBOMHardware bill of materials and software bill of materials: the list of the components inside a product, with name, version, supplier and, for software, a hash and the dependency relationships, so that a vulnerability announced in a component can be traced to the products that contain it. Section 7.5 and component C2.7 [15].
Hierarchy of controlsThe five levels of control in decreasing order of effectiveness: eliminate the hazard, substitute something less hazardous, engineer the hazard away from the person, administer the work, protect the person. Section 6.3 and component C4.2 [10].
ICTInformation and communications technology; CISA's supply-chain work is about ICT products and services. Section 7.5 [15].
IEC 31010The companion standard to ISO 31000 that catalogs risk assessment techniques, from brainstorming to Bayesian networks. Section 4.1 [1].
INFORMThe open risk index of the Joint Research Centre and its partners: a tree from some fifty indicators through hazard and exposure, vulnerability and lack of coping capacity to one score per country, with a reliability index for the data. Section 8.3 and component C3.5 [7].
Inter-rater agreementA statistic for how far two or more people, coding the same material independently, reach the same result; used in the book's research agenda to test whether the placement of sources on the cycle is a property of the sources or of the author. Chapter 10, For the researcher.
IRRBBInterest rate risk in the banking book: the effect of interest-rate movements on the earnings and the economic value of the positions a bank does not trade. Section 5.1 [5].
JSONJavaScript Object Notation, a plain-text format for structured data that any program can read: a record is a list of named fields and their values, which may themselves be lists or records. Despite the name it is independent of any programming language and is the common format for exchanging data between systems. The NIST register series publishes its register row and detail record as JSON files [9]; appendix C is written in it.
JSON SchemaA JSON file that describes what another JSON file must look like: which fields are required, of what type, with which allowed values. A validator reads the schema and says whether a record conforms. This is what the book means by a machine-readable format as opposed to an idea. Chapter 13 and appendix C [9].
KRI (key risk indicator)A measured quantity, with a threshold, that moves before a risk materializes or records that it has; the book keeps the word indicator and defines leading and lagging. Component C5.2.
Language modelA program trained on large quantities of text to predict and generate language; the engine behind most software agents in use today. Chapters 2, 7 and 23.
Machine-readablePublished in a format with defined fields, types and rules, such that a program can read, validate and exchange it without a person interpreting the text. Four of the twenty-seven sources are machine-readable in this sense. Chapter 13.
Monte Carlo simulationA method that estimates the distribution of an outcome by computing a model many thousands of times with inputs drawn at random from their own distributions. Section 6.5 and component C3.4 [26].
NGFSThe Network for Greening the Financial System, the group of central banks and supervisors that publishes the climate scenarios used in stress testing. Section 5.6 and component C3.8 [13].
NPR 8000.4CThe NASA procedural requirement for agency risk management, read with the NASA Risk Management Handbook. Section 6.4 [11].
OrdinalA scale whose values are ordered but not spaced: a 4 is worse than a 3, but not necessarily twice as bad as a 2, so ordinal scores cannot be multiplied or averaged without a stated rule. Component C3.2 [12].
Persistent identifierA code assigned to a thing that never changes and is never reused, so that a hazard, a component or a record means the same thing in every dataset and every year. The hazard dictionary assigns one to each of its two hundred and eighty-one hazards. Component C2.5 [24].
PRA (probabilistic risk assessment)The engineering method that models how a system can fail as sequences of events with probabilities, and combines them into a likelihood and consequence for each outcome. Section 6.4 [11].
PtD (Prevention through Design)The NIOSH initiative to remove hazards at the design stage rather than control them in operation. Section 6.3 and component C4.4 [10].
RBS (risk breakdown structure)A hierarchy of the sources of risk, three levels deep, by analogy with the work breakdown structure of a project. Section 9.1 and component C2.1 [3].
RetractionThe withdrawal of a published input, such as a scenario or a dataset, by its publisher; the seventh principle requires every external input to carry its version and its retraction status as data. Component C3.8 [13].
Reverse stress testA stress test run backwards: start from the outcome that would break the organization and search for the scenarios that produce it. Component C3.7 [25].
RMFRisk Management Framework, the NIST lifecycle in which an information system is categorized, its controls selected, implemented, assessed and authorized, and then monitored. Section 7.2 and component C5.7 [20]. Not to be confused with the NIST AI RMF, the AI Risk Management Framework [21].
Roll-upThe summarizing of records from a lower tier into a higher one, system to process to organization to enterprise, which works only when the fields mean the same thing at every tier. Components C1.7 and C6.1 [9] [20].
Scenario tripletThe three questions of probabilistic risk assessment, what can go wrong, how likely it is, and what the consequences are, each answered with its uncertainty. Component C3.1 [11].
SchemaA formal description of the structure of a record: its fields, their types and the rules they obey. See JSON Schema. Chapter 13 and appendix C.
SCRM (supply chain risk management)The management of the risk that a product or service carries from the components and suppliers behind it; CISA's task force and vendor template are about the ICT supply chain. Section 7.5 [15].
Version number (three-part)The numbering the catalog and the schema use: the third part rises for a correction, the second for a change that keeps what adopters built valid, the first for a change that may not. Chapter 25.
Sendai FrameworkThe United Nations framework for disaster risk reduction 2015 to 2030, with four priorities, seven targets and thirty-eight indicators. Section 8.2 [24].
Sensitivity analysisVarying each input of a model in turn to see how much the output moves, which tells the analyst which inputs deserve the most care. Component C3.4 [26].
TaxonomyA classification of things into a hierarchy of categories; the book requires the risk taxonomy to be organized by source, with an other branch at every level. Component C2.1 [3].
ValidatorA program that checks a record against a schema and reports whether it conforms, so that the check is run by software rather than argued in a meeting. Chapter 13.